Headline
Message text
There are many ideas and perspectives on all of the various acts of sex, sexuality, sex drive, sexual motivation, rules, guidelines, standards, etc. There are probably as many as there are people.
I'd like to present some of my thoughts on the matter.
First of all, I believe that sex and all the stuff associated with it can be highly individualized and yet not too many different ideas. What I mean by that, for example is, should sex before marriage be acceptable. Well there really only two answers there, yes or no. Now you can come up with all kinds of ifs, and, and buts about it but still the answer will be yes or no.
Clearly there is a lot more to the topic than that, however there is a lot more to talk about.
Does anyone woman need to be "beautiful" to be sexually attractive to a man? First of all beauty is in the eye of the beholder, however there are far more normal looking people (men and women) than there are beautiful people. Pretty much all people have or, will have sex so beauty isn't the deciding factor. There is some initial attraction tied to appearance but other factors are probably more important. I think that I've said enough about general appearance.
Let's get to my favorite topic, boobs. Boobs, breasts, tits, bazombas, bosoms, jubblies, jugs, fun bags, udders, etc. There are so many names for boobs that I could probably come up with a dozen more and still not get them all. The first question is size. Is bigger better? Well in my mind if bigger was truly better then through evolution and natural selection all women would have big boobs, clearly that isn't the case. Some men prefer big, some men are "grossed out" with big. Some men prefer small, some men can't be bothered with small. "More than a handful (or mouthful) is excess" is a common comment. The "size of a champagne glass" was often mentioned in years gone by but now the shape of a champagne flute gives a wholly different image. Breast shape is often quoted as "banana boobs" "saggy", droopy, and more often describes the overall shape. Firm, swaying, bouncing, rigid, plastic, bolt ons, are all terms used to describe boobs. I'm not sure of another part of the human anatomy with more descriptive terms. Clearly boobs are important.
Now my opinion on boobs: I like boobs. I'm a "boob man" bigger is better, to a point (no pub intended). I enjoy seeing/ feeling smaller boobs, I like seeing/ feeling medium sized boobs, I love seeing/ feeling big boobs, I like seeing/ feeling really big boobs, I enjoy seeing/ feeling huge boobs. If you read that section carefully you should see my trend. Basically I like pretty much all boobs, some more than others.
Bra vs braless, yes! Again it doesn't matter, I love checking out boobs as women walk down the street. I really like it if they are swinging freely unbounded by a bra. I live to see the nipples poking through.
Firm or not? Again, yes! I actually prefer some sag. Part of this tells me they are real, when a breast will swing, sway, jiggle, bounce more than a firm breast. There is more life there, this is my preference.
Pokies or not? Yes. I do enjoy seeing the nipples peeking through especially if they are pointing down a little (this indicates a little sag in the breast therefore real and natural), however if they are pointing straight ahead like headlights that is fine too. Pierced? Not so much, although this usually keeps the nipples pointing out most of the time it starts shifting into the realm of fake.
Probably the only type of boobs that I have problems with are fake ones. Now I don't mean reconstructed breasts due to medical issues, I mean implants to fulfill someone's vanity. If I'm watching some interesting porn and I see some scars on the boobs from implants, I'll immediately shut it off and move on to something else.
Boobs weren't the only interesting part for all women but it certainly the part easiest to observe. There are comments and occasional pictures of the "camel toe". Personally I'm much more interested in the boobs. A look up a skirt with a glimpse of what's there is certainly gratifying, however if there aren't any panties, it's hard to tell what you're seeing!
Now down to more important business, fucking! I'm a firm believer in a woman having the full right to engage in sex as she likes and when she likes. Marriage shouldn't be a shackle that prevents a woman from a sex life. If she wants to "be faithful" to her husband that's fine, if not that should be her decision. A man shouldn't be allowed to tell her no! So what does this really mean? There is no such thing as "sharing". Sharing implies that someone is owned and the owner is allowing sometime else access to their property. Swapping, has much the same connotation. So with that in mind, who decided that a "slut" is a bad thing? In my mind that means this is a woman that enjoys sex and has sex when and where she wants and that is fine.
Extending that thought, what is cheating? What Is cuckolding? To define cheating you must define what is having sex, or more specifically when has someone been fucked? In an episode of Seinfeld, Jerry is asked "when has sex taken place?" His response was "when the nipple appears." Well, I don't agree with that at all. In my opinion, sex has occured when both people have reached orgasm. In addition it can only truly occur without a condom. So, if your wife "plays" with someone and neither one cums, no sex has occurred. If he wears a condom, it's just pretend, no cream pie, no fucking has occured! Full penetration, she cums, he cums INSIDE HER okay, that is fucking. Facial, cum on boobs, cum on ass, pull out, not really fucking.
The are my thoughts and opinions, I'd love to hear what you think!
You need to log in so that our AI can start recommending suitable works that you will definitely like.
There are no comments yet - be the first to add one!
Add new comment